In 2016, I was like this will get solved when Clinton is elected. That's naive on like six different levels. But we know how that election went. And so in 2017, I wonder if there's a profitable way to do this. It turns out in retrospect, when you go back and Berkeley carbon trading group has done an analysis as well, now a formal academic analysis of what's the quality of those? Like 95% to 99% are just worthless from a carbon impact perspective.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode