The Importance of Time in Decision Making

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Even relatively straightforward seeming fallacies like the sun-cost fallacy might actually have some usefulness given that we are embedded in this very rich and very uncertain life. So having already worked for years for a project and kind of assuming it might not go well in the future, but also not knowing, might still mean that it is more useful to work on it. Maybe we often just really don't know and given that life radically depends on what you've done before, it might be useful. I'm not saying I think it's never a fallacy, but many of those very obvious biases no longer seem really obvious to me.

Read the full transcript here.

What is the Great Rationality Debate? What are axiomatic rationality and ecological rationality? How irrational are people anyway? What's the connection between rationality and wisdom? What are some of the paradigms in cognitive science? Why do visual representations of information often communicate their meaning much more effectively than other kinds of representations?

Anna Riedl is a cognitive scientist with a primary research interest in judgement and decision-making under unmeasurable uncertainty, a field in the intersection of psychology, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. She loves the scientific method so much that she regularly spreads her joy about it in various formats of science communication. In the end, she cares about ideas being applied in the real world, solving problems, and benefitting humanity. This means she often plays the role of being an interface between the two worlds of ideas and their application by humans. Over the last years, she has founded and lead different organizations in the DACH region that work on improving the world. You can find more about her at riedlanna.com, follow her on Twitter at @annaleptikon, or email her at annariedl.office@gmail.com.

Further reading: