Political Motives Behind Encouraging Confrontation

2. Minneapolis Situation & ICE Confrontations A. Escalating Conflict

• Recent fatal confrontations between civilians and ICE agents in Minneapolis.
• Two individuals (not known to be violent criminals) have been killed during encounters.
• Host urges toning down rhetoric from both political sides to prevent further escalation.

B. Comparison Between Texas and Minnesota

• Texas sees far more ICE arrests but fewer violent confrontations.
• Reasons suggested:
  • Texas law enforcement cooperates with ICE.
  • Minnesota politicians (governor/mayor) allegedly encourage public confrontation with ICE.

C. Violent Protest Structure

• Minneapolis protests are organized, funded, and oper­ated similarly to military groups.
• Reports mentioned:
  • Surveillance operations against law enforcement
  • Protesters allegedly sabotaging vehicles and physically attacking officers
  • Autonomous‑zone style barricades forming in some areas

3. Responsibility & Advice Regarding Police Encounters

• Do not escalate encounters with law enforcement.
• Entering a protest with a firearm greatly increases danger for everyone involved.
• Legal principles discussed:
  • Lethal force is justified if officers reasonably believe there is a threat.
  • Officers cannot shoot fleeing suspects unless they pose serious immediate danger.

4. Media Narratives & Political Messaging A. Suburban Women as Target Audience

• Democrats viewed as shaping narratives (e.g., “ICE shoots mother of three,” “ICE detains 5‑year‑old”) to emotionally influence suburban voters.
• Hosts argue some widely publicized stories were misleading or false.

B. Claims of Political Motives

• Democrats are using these incidents to distract from:
  • A major Minnesota fraud scandal involving billions of dollars.
• Each new confrontation diverts media attention from that scandal.

5. Anticipated Government Shutdown A. Democrat Position

• Multiple Democratic leaders publicly oppose funding DHS/ICE at current levels.
• Statements from Senators (Schumer, Warren, Murphy) emphasize refusal to pass DHS funding bill without ICE restrictions.

B. Hosts’ Conclusion

• They expect a government shutdown, driven by attempts to:
  • Defund or weaken ICE
  • Appeal to progressive voters
  • Control political narrative ahead of elections
• Shutdown would affect agencies not yet funded (e.g., Defense, Labor, Education, HHS, HUD, DHS).

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: https://x.com/tedcruz

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.