Gret weinstein was once admired across party lines as an independent thinker. His scepticism about some elements of the pandemic response, ding the vaccine programme and his interest in potential other treatments for covid, was deemed to have crossed a line. This week he was in london, and he came into the studio to talk. Whether you think he went too far over the pandemic or not far enough, whether you strongly agree with him or strongly disagree with him,. i hope you'll see that he gives an honest account of his experience and a sincere expression of what he thinks went wrong and what might be coming next. Enjoy.
Freddie Sayers sits down to discuss the pandemic response with Biologist, Bret Weinstein.
Before the pandemic, evolutionary biologist and former Evergreen professor Bret Weinstein was lauded by both sides of the political divide for his insights into the crisis on American campuses. As a member of the so-called 'intellectual dark web', Weinstein was expanding his audience and being profiled by legacy media like the New York Times.
Then the pandemic began and his heterodox perspective suddenly fell out of favour, even with many of his erstwhile allies.
Advocating for alternative treatments for Covid, questioning the efficacy of the global vaccine programme and challenging narratives of the pandemic came at a cost. Without warning, the Dark Horse podcast was demonetised on YouTube and Weinstein was forced to split from the views of his former friends and supporters.
So, how can we seek truth in such divided times? Freddie Sayers invited Bret into the UnHerd studio in London to try to understand what his views really are.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.