I can't imagine that I would enjoy that in any way, shape or form. It just sounds like something that like I'm built to hate my... What if he let you keep podcasting for very bad wizards? If I could do that and still have that job. And you make like you make like ... I don't know. Like a million dollars a year, a million dollarsa year or something if you do that. So I would say that I definitely wouldn't do it. There isn't really enough money. Maybe there is if you got up to the point where I could... But it's like the George the Chemist, like the Bernard Williams case of George the Chem
David and Tamler argue about William James' classic essay "The Will to Believe." What's more important - avoiding falsehood or discovering truth? When (if ever) is it rational to believe anything without enough evidence? What about beliefs that we can't be agnostic about? Are there hypotheses that we have to believe in order for them to come true? Does James successfully demonstrate that faith can be rational?
Plus, a philosopher at Apple who's not allowed to talk to the media - what are they hiding? And why are academics constantly telling students that academia is a nightmare?
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: