Why You Shouldn't Look at the Literature Too Soon

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

At Google, of course, you've hired economists to work in your group. You're always looking for smart, hardworking people with good values. What would make someone good for Google but not so great for Berkeley? It's a question. If you look at what would make them good for Google, they should have better than average computer skills.

Before he became the Adam Smith of Googlenomics, Hal Varian spent decades as an academic economist, writing influential papers, a popular book about the information economy, and several textbooks that are still taught today. So how has his nearly twenty years in the business world affected what he’d write and teach now? Is learning Shephard’s lemma really that important anymore?

Tyler asks Hal these questions and more: why aren’t there more second-priced auctions — or prediction markets? How have the economics of sales changed with the internet? In what ways did his hiring criteria change between academia and business? What could we learn from the sack of Rome? When should economists avoid looking at the literature? How are we always eking out victory in the war on spam? And what are people least likely to understand about Google? Fear not — Hal has an answer for it all.

Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links.

Recorded May 10th, 2019 Other ways to connect

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram
Follow Tyler on Twitter
Follow Hal on Twitter
Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu
Subscribe at our newsletter page to have the latest Conversations with Tyler news sent straight to your inbox.