The First Amendment's Cool With Jaw-Boning

There's also transparency concerns around if you're pressuring the intermediary, you can do that in a way that might be more opaque than going into pressuring individuals. So there is something special about using the intermediary that raises all these particular concerns and is being raised in this context. And so I guess sort of a very leading question, but is the First Amendment cool with this? Like, how does the First Amendment think about this generally speaking?