The Replication Debate on Blood Sugar Level and Self-Control

19min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

In this chapter, they discuss a debate about the replication of a study on blood sugar level and self-control. They explain that the frontal cortex of the brain is expensive in terms of energy and discuss the legitimacy of the effect, stating that it is not as strong as originally believed. They also mention challenges to other studies, such as the hungry judges finding, and highlight the importance of distributed causality in understanding these effects.

Meet Jared Diamond and Michael Shermer: https://skeptic.com/event

Robert Sapolsky is the author of A Primate’s Memoir, The Trouble with Testosterone, and Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers. His most recent book, Behave, was a New York Times bestseller and named a best book of the year by the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal. He is a professor of biology and neurology at Stanford University and the recipient of a MacArthur Foundation “Genius Grant.” His new book is Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will.

Shermer and Sapolsky discuss: free will, determinism, compatibilism, libertarian free will • Christian List’s 3 related capacities for free will • how what people believe about free will and determinism influences their behaviors • the three horsemen of determinism: (1) reductionism (2) predetermination; (3) epiphenomenalism • dualism • punishment • retributive vs. restorative justice •Is the self an illusion? • game theory evolution of punishment • luck • and meaning (or lack thereof).