The fascinating about the market is, in some way that's more materialist than the kind of traditional, like civil wright's version. In this in the sense that new democrats framed poverty as solvuble by transforming poor people into these new antripeal subjects. So you are trying to solve equality through a system itself that's inherently, that has inherent inequities within it. Yet it's also materialist, even if in a twisted way.
Dan's second episode with historian Lily Geismer, who he interviewed in 2019 about Don't Blame Us: Suburban Liberals and the Transformation of the Democratic Party. This interview is on Left Behind: The Democrats' Failed Attempt to Solve Inequality, which details the long history of Clintonism and the Democrats’ neoliberal turn.
Read the latest newsletter. It's on what Ruthie meant when she said abolition was another word for communism: thedigradio.com/newsletter31
Listen to Geismer's first Dig interview: thedigradio.com/podcast/race-and-class-in-the-liberal-suburbs-with-lily-geismer
Support The Dig at Patreon.com/TheDig