The most decentralized thing would of course then be to run your own data. If the validators censor, like could something like Lido do the censorship or not really? Would it still need to be the validators that they've delegated to actively doing it? So in that sense there are three layers. And I would say Lido has of course soft powers over their validators because they can simply say as soon as a validator doesn't do specific things.
In this week’s episode, Anna and Martin Köppelmann, Co-Founder of Gnosis discuss the OFAC sanctions against Tornado Cash and the impact this has had on builders in the community. They specifically focus on how the Tornado action helped reveal centralizing forces in Ethereum as well as the need for decentralization.
Here are some additional links for this episode:
Find the Anoma Whitepaper here
ZK Jobs Board – has a fresh batch of open roles from ZK-focused projects. Find your next opportunity working in ZK!
Today’s episode is sponsored by Aleo.
Aleo is a new Layer-1 blockchain that achieves the programmability of Ethereum, the privacy of Zcash, and the scalability of a rollup.
If you’re interested in building private applications then check out Aleo’s programming language called Leo. Visit leo-lang.org to start building.
You can also join Aleo’s incentivized testnet3 by downloading and running a snarkOS node. No sign-up is necessary to participate. For questions, join their Discord at aleo.org/discord.
If you like what we do: