Dannet: strasson's most obvious mistake is his misrepresentation of my main claim. What bothers me about the denet view? And i love dennet because he's done a lot for integrating a these strans of thinking from within norro science, just philosophy of mind. But he does do this thing that really bugs me, which i won't call science scientism, because i won't stoop to your level. He says, well, no, look, pain is just an illusion by analys you say that, ye, he says. It's illusory. The analogies that he's trying to make is sort of like a with the narrative self
It’s the topic voted on by our beloved Patreon patrons, panpsychism! David and Tamler delve into the resurgent debate over whether consciousness is the fundamental stuff that makes up the universe. We hoped we might be entering Miyazaki land - river spirits, benevolent radishes, a universal mind. But is this just the same old philosophy of mind debate with different words? Are there any stakes to this debate or is it purely terminological? Plus – we answer some last-minute questions from listeners on dissertations, Ukraine, pseudoscience, and the music from "The Shield."
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: