Attorney generals from countries like australia, the u, k and the us. Are asking for an omission of an act versus adding a back door into inscription. And i mean, somehow it feels much less offensive. This business has established and built a platform, and it's done it in this way. We're not advocating that there should be incription. I just think we need o maybe think a little bit. The question is, nd to nd, is there any sort of point at which it was possible to view in on these things?

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode