i'm always sceptical of pcycle cycles, cyclical theories of historyounw we mention in our off camera discussion. Stephen j gould, you know, is ponent of contingency. History moves along very contingent. There are very few cycles. Even economists now have largely given up on psyclical theories of economics. It may take quite a lot of brain power to say, i have four people, and the different people are doing the same thing 4 ways. What am i going to choose? What criteria do I use for my decision-making process? And so that's what makes a rapid, intedetic evolutiona more time consuming. Is one of the reasons why cultural

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode