Investigative journalism basics

In this new episode of Heretics, Andrew Gold speaks with Camilla Tominey about the growing public frustration with the BBC, the long-running accusations of BBC bias, and why so many viewers now feel the broadcaster has lost its sense of impartiality. From the Martin Bashir scandal and Princess Diana to the Trump documentary editing controversy, the conversation takes a detailed look at how the BBC handles political reporting, culture war issues and internal accountability.

SPONSORS:

• Grab your free seat to the 2-Day AI Mastermind: https://link.outskill.com/GOLDNOV4 
• Start fresh at tryfum.com/products/zero-crisp-mint . Over 500,000 people have already made the switch — no nicotine, no vapor, no batteries. Just flavor, fidget, and a fresh start.
• Get up to 45% off Ekster with my code ANDREWGOLDHERETICS: https://partner.ekster.com/andrewgoldheretics 
• Use Code ANDREW FOR 25% OFF Plaud Note: https://bit.ly/4nJWt7j 
• Plaud Note Pro: https://bit.ly/423JiWv 
• Grab your free seat to the 2-Day AI Mastermind: https://link.outskill.com/ANDREWS2 
• Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at https://mintmobile.com/heretics 
• Start your MyHeritage journey now with a 14-day free trial using my link: https://bit.ly/AndrewGoldMyHeritage

Follow Camilla Tominey: https://x.com/CamillaTominey 

Follow The Daily T Podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJnf_DDTfIVBV8Pt89mSFIFfZBPkWUoB6

Camilla discusses how “the BBC has always acted with a degree of arrogance about the quality of its journalism” and why producers covering topics like Donald Trump, Gaza, and transgender debates often create content shaped by a strong ideological worldview. She explains how teams sometimes behave as if “if you don’t agree with me, you’re not just wrong but bad and evil”.

Andrew and Camilla revisit the leaked internal memos that changed the conversation around BBC neutrality, and why critics argue that the organisation often reacts to scrutiny with “silence, shame and cancellation instead of reflection”.

Some who oppose Camilla’s reporting have claimed, and these are not her words, that “this is a Telegraph right wing plot to destabilise the BBC”. The episode breaks down where these accusations come from and why they persist.

They take a close look at the BBC Trump documentary controversy and ask whether the public reaction would have been the same if the editing had been applied to Joe Biden. Camilla suggests that instead of “crying mutiny and coup”, the broadcaster should examine the substance of what is being alleged.

The conversation also covers gender politics and public activism. Camilla notes how she does not see right wing commentators wearing masks and shouting “out, out, out, scum, scum, scum” in the streets, while Andrew adds his own satirical “Raus!” as they explore how toxic the culture wars have become.

This wide-ranging interview touches on BBC leadership under Tim Davie, public debate around immigration, and why many viewers privately agree with opinions they feel unable to express publicly. The discussion ends with questions about Nigel Farage, whether Tommy Robinson could ever run for office, and a humorous look at Andrew’s own baptism.

If you are interested in media bias, political journalism, free speech, British culture wars and the future of the BBC, this is a deep dive into one of the most important debates in modern broadcasting.

#CamillaTominey #BBCBias #HereticsPodcast 

Join the 30k heretics on my mailing list: https://andrewgoldheretics.com 

Check out my new documentary channel: https://youtube.com/@andrewgoldinvestigates 

Andrew on X: https://twitter.com/andrewgold_ok  

Insta: https://www.instagram.com/andrewgold_ok

Heretics YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@andrewgoldheretics

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices