The chapter delves into the complexities and challenges of selecting a fair and impartial jury for a highly publicized case, focusing on the Trump trial. It highlights the importance of addressing preconceived notions, political biases, and self-assessment of impartiality among potential jurors. The conversation explores the strategies, tools, and implications of jury selection, balancing legal procedures with political considerations.
The jury selection process is still underway in former President Donald Trump's Manhattan criminal trial. In order to get on the jury, Manhattanites responded to a questionnaire with 42 questions ranging from whether they belong to QAnon or Antifa to what podcasts they listen to. The attorneys on both sides scrutinized their social media posts, asked them about their opinions of Trump, and had the opportunity to ask they be removed from consideration.
This is all with the goal of impaneling an unbiased jury. It’s one of the most important parts of the process and also gets at the heart of a lot of what we talk about on the 538 Politics podcast. Based on a person’s own biography and demography, how do they feel about the former president and his criminal prosecution?
In this installment of the podcast, Galen speaks with law professors Jessica Roth and Valerie Hans about the challenges of jury selection and what lack of bias we can expect from jurors in such a unique trial.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices