The Argument From Naturalism About Beauty, Right?

I think there's a steed of truth in an argument that there is something objective about beauty, right? So you have to leave aside for a second because I'm not trying to push these two arguments together. If we can create more beautiful things, they will shift the definition of beauty to things that ultimately might be unaesthetic, right? That's a very different argument than one that's presented and it doesn't get into this other argument from naturalism. And so what I would prompt this conversation is who deserves the power to say what is beautiful? It definitely isn't people with treads in their Twitter handle or Treasuries.