I Don't Think It's Possible to Think of Imaginary as an Equal Player

I don't think it's possible to think of imaginary as an equal player in the symbolic real relation, right? I mean, I think it's like imaginary covers over the real. And then I also am not sure you can count if even if you accept that, I'm not sure that you can count object as a separate thing when all it is is really the nodding together of the other three. So I just have a deep suspicion of the discourses, not for one, I thinkIt hides mastery. And the second thing is I just think it hides that there is one signifying structure and that it's just, that's what’s always at work. But how does