If an archer was not in cognitive dissonance, here's the answer. He would need two things: genetic gifts that made him good at this and disciplined practice. But if you get, instead, complication about complication, it's really hard to say how he became a great archery. That's what I was looking for. It might be right every time. We have no tools to know that they got it right. Their rightness has no value whatsoever because I can't confirm it."