The socialist spectrum was the exact opposite. On the left, you had the anarchists, who wanted no state government at all. And on the right, the parliamentary socialists were happy to keep increasing the size and power of the state over the economy. The idea of individualism on the right versus collectivism on the left also doesn't work. All socialists are economic collectivists. But it was on the anarchist left that you had the most concern for individual rights and freedoms.
00:00
Transcript
chevron_right
Play full episode
chevron_right
Transcript
Episode notes
This episode is for everyone who keeps writing to me to insist that one or the other wrong, incoherent, popular definitions of Left and Right is actually the correct one.
How do we know the left and right refer to equality and hierarchy?
To answer this, we look at who was considered as being on the left and on the right in three different time periods:
The early French revolution in 1789, which is what the whole left-right political spectrum is an analogy to.
The 3rd republic in France where seating in the National Assembly was first purposefully arranged on a left-right spectrum, analogous to the early French Revolution.
The different branches of late 19th and early 20th Century socialist movement: Anarchism, Revolutionary Party Socialism and Parliamentary Socialism.
And we apply all of the junk cold war definitions – the market vs. the state, the individual vs. the collective, big vs. small government, equality vs. liberty – and we watch them all crash and burn, leaving only the equality vs. hierarchy / class conflict paradigm left standing.
Apply this exercise on your own to any historical period from 1789 until the rise of the USSR and the cold war, and you get the same results.
Now can everyone accept it and move on?
Bonus episode to follow shortly to explain why Fascism is on the far right and Communism is on the far left when Nazi Germany and Stalin’s USSR are both archetypical “totalitarian” societies.
