I believe i felt like i was open minded, like i could think clearly about things. I felt that i was emotionals, arguably, like i'm angry. The third one is pretty tratfu sat, yes, there's tasteful. Thn, what is that? That er, how could you interpret that? Your un mechanical turk,. which, by the way, they were, or at least some of they, or prolific. No, i think it was a mechanical turk. But tes both beo, remember. Yeso, this is like, maybe, like, used as a means rather than an end in itself. So you should be on board
Panpsychism didn't give us river spirits or mischievous sootballs, so this time we go straight to the source - a defense of animism, and in a top 10 analytic philosophy journal. Could a failed argument for the existence of God establish the existence of trees and mountains with “interiority” and “social characteristics”? Tamler wants to believe, but is the argument that'll push him over the edge?
Plus – speaking of top journals, a doozy of social psych article: Is forgiveness better than revenge at rehumanizing the self? Let's check the voodoo dolls to find out. Tamler is delighted by David’s reaction to this one.
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links:
- The Common Consent Argument for the Existence of Nature Spirits by Tiddy Smith
- Peoples, H. C., Duda, P., & Marlowe, F. W. (2016). Hunter-gatherers and the origins of religion. Human Nature, 27(3), 261-282.
- Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethnos, 71(1), 9-20.