The Externalist Answer to the Meta Level Circularity Problem

This is the sort of meta level circular area that haunts epistemology projects in general, right? And there's a lot of proposed solutions to this. I actually find the externalist option probably one of the more plausible ones, right? Yeah. One way that you might want to formulate it, if you're a theist to kind of avoid this, is just say, hey, look, we have to start from the position that like, these radical forms of skepticism is false and this generally liability,. That might be a reason to pick up something like Ross's theory as an explanation for it.