The Manipulation Argument Against Compatibility

Some of your recent work explores how more foundational work in metaphysics, what we've been talking about in an intentional agency and metaphysics of causation bears on these issues. In a response to the manipulation argument against compatibilism, you argue that manipulation is relevantly different from ordinary causal determination. Could you say something, maybe describe a case of causal deviance, saying something about that and then explain how that affects intentional agency? Yeah. I was very interesting. Anyways, that's a long way for me to answer your question. I'm not sure.