Invading a Sovereign Country, Despite the Lack of Direct Provocation

i think it's worth noting that sadam was a brutal dictator who killed tens of thousands of his own people. i just don't think that argument holds if we look at the specifics of each case. And in terms of invading a sovereign country, despite the lack of direct provocation, you know what's coming next. So, yes, the us. Has done bad things, but to make a direct moral equivalency and say, us two thousand three is equal to russia 20 22 doesn't hold up.