Scientific theories should be falsifiable, testable, refutable, whichever word you want to use. Popper himself noted that Freud's theories didn't seem to fit this bill. For a theory that explains anything actually explains nothing. So both Freudianism and Marxism are deemed unscientific. We are forever guessing to the truth with our conjectured theories. Any of our theories at any time could be rendered problematic by some new piece of evidence or criticism. But if nothing is certain, we could even drop our best theories at any moment. Or do we really make progress in circles? I don't think so; science does not explicitly explain what we're trying to understand.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode