The people who ran the study, they neglected to mention some of their conflicts of interest. So I would say that qualifies them as frauds. Is that too strong? If you have a connection to the manufacturer of Ivermectin and you don't disclose that when you print your results, that feels like you intended people to be misled to me. It's probably not fraud from a legal sense but ethically, as the word fraud gets used in common use, it's frauds.
My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
- Climate Alarmism Deaths Prediction
- AI's rate of change
- Zoom school, major failure
- Kyle Bass on ESG climate deaths
- President Biden's semi-fascist TRAP for republicans
- What we're NOT being told about Mar-a-Lago boxes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support