Meikles & Dimes cover image

127: Brent Dunn | Volcano Hunter & LSAT Instructor (Part 1)

Meikles & Dimes

00:00

Distinguishing Absence of Proof vs. Proof Against - Logical Fallacies Analysis

The chapter delves into the common logical fallacies surrounding the misconception that absence of proof equates to proof against something. Examples are shared to illustrate how flawed studies or lack of evidence doesn't invalidate a claim. The importance of recognizing this distinction is emphasized in various contexts like social media and scientific debates.

Transcript
Play full episode

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app