I think that's what so depressing is it's not totally clear what to do. Even if you agree with his conclusions, and i emphatically do, every point, like kind of agree with, buti it's not clear what toDo in the contemporary world. You could say, well, what's wrong with rigor, right? What's wrong with skipping to to rigorous hypothesis driven research? A n nd, i think ash makes it clear that there is nothing wrong specifically, right? That, in fact, he even states t the experimental method is one of the greatest scientific developments. It's crucial to to understanding causalityd drawing inferences about the natural world. But what
Is social psychology just a kid dressing up in grown-up science clothes? Are the methods in social psychology--hypothesis-driven experiments and model-building--appropriate for the state of the field? Or do these methods lead to a narrowing of vision, stifled creativity, and a lack of informed curiosity about the social world> David and Tamler discuss the strong methodological critique of psychology from two of its leading practitioners - Paul Rozin and Solomon Asch.
Plus, food porn, real estate porn, outrage porn, and David's personal favorite - power washing porn.
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: