Do

you think the way that they'll attack a trying to have that control is through some kind of regulatory angle instead, where they realize it's not going to work to ban it, but they can make it to where they know everything that's going on from the way they manage regulations. I think

it's, it's a tough question, but i think hat what they've already seen happen is a lot of offshoring rit a lot of reglatory arbitrage, where you have like bitmeks off shore, f t x, derabit and so on. And so they've seen that wall. If they just don't have a good regulatory framework for it, people are going to do it anyway, and there's always places they can do it from. And so i think of them recognizing that it's kind of, its kind of now created a like like the like. The more people can have substitutesubstitution goods, the less likely the government is to be ultra draconian, because it just pushes theactivity off. And i think that's the narrative that a lot of the us. Script recees have been pushing, which is to say, you know, if you regulate it too hard, it's going to happen anyway, but you're just not going be able to see at all what's happening. And you know, your your country may also be at a big disadvantage, right? So i think that plays into it for sure. Right? We're a like, lik. I actually don't think that governments are our statust as as people think they want to be like. I think that game theory wises long term. There's definitely, like, a case to be made up of the us. Like they said, play this is really bad for the dollar, whatever. But that even in the us. Itself, you, like, you see a bifercation, right? Like, you, like, you see a lot of bigcon adoption now among like, the people we could say were like, the ex trump administration, or easy like scarauce, like bannon, this kind of thing. And, like, if they hyper biconize bi coin, like, you know, that's good for some americans as bad for others, right? Unti you almost may see, like, you almost may see, like, a, like, that may be what creates the us. Civil wars, right? Where then the us. Li okewa, we're going to have these multiple regions or something, or or, you know, thit's going to be. So, they're so many different players, like, for, like, s no singular government. There's no singular government that's like a, you geser, you know, this is what we want to do. There's no gende like that. It is people themselves. So, i think of that, now, some people don't mind seeing the dollar fall a bit, and then having a, you knowt big one has a store of value. So, you know, it's, that's kind of, that's kind of, been, i think, a, think, daniel cravis, he wrote about this a long time ago, where he said, like, eventually, as scripture goes up, you know, people politically powerful, cripto people will be part of government as well. And t e, this infiltration just keeps going and going and going, and then suddenlyou realize, like, it just becomes the establishment. And you know, that tha nothing. Youre seeing happening already with elon musk, or where, you know, people really wake up when they seethis cind of soflike elon musk, like redalo. These are huge conservative names in general, in in finance, so enough for them to support bicquin now. Pepor sikewa, this has the establishment support.