The Neo-Calvinist Confession of Faith

The book does end with a series of propositions that you want to defend. Is that like a neo-Calvinist confession at the end? So one of the things that's interesting historically about the book is the way that you highlight how within reformed theology there are lots of different confessions. You present that as a strength, that it's inherently diverse and so on. And that there's not some kind of very arbitrary uniformity that's imposed on how it develops. Instead it grows organically, right? But I don't want to jump the gun too much in our conversations and leap ahead to something at the end of the book.