What's the Purpose of All These Rules About Covenants?

I'm wondering if there's an inconsistency here, because the tyrant's law creates the concept for him of good. So we're not in a position to judge these things. And certainly he believes, no er how bad the tyrant is, he definitely says this, it's still better than the state of nature. So there's still no justification for overthrowing the tyrant. The only thing the sovereign can't do is just say, you have to me kill you and not defend yourself. That that's the limit of the sovereign's power,. Because it is not in human nature to be able to. I took itat he's trying to understand the social contract itself. He's not saying