Rembrandt took risks with his work. He will not steer clear of that and it costs him dearly. Do you think actually ever to be declared a masterpiece? I first n you, ofe seeing a bit of the painting. Is much, much bigger. But the poit at on want to may is all these people gust up in their fancy dress, cantit militia. Are free citizens. We are not like the regiments,. the ridiculous, vile, catholic despots in france and spain. And shold the duty call, we will shoot our muskets and we will march forth. So it's chaotic. It's chaotic. And that is the point
We compare the works of two of the greatest painters of the Dutch Golden Age: Rembrandt and Vermeer. Making the case for Rembrandt van Rijn in this debate was historian, author and broadcaster Simon Schama. For Schama, Rembrandt's works are raw humanity personified with formal beauty being the least of the painter's concerns. Novelist Tracy Chevalier, however, champions Johannes Vermeer. She claims that the artist's charm lies in the very fact that he absents himself from his paintings and as a result they are less didactic and more magical.
The debate was chaired by art historian, writer and museum director, Tim Marlow.
For a list of works referenced in this debate, along with links to each, please go to:
https://intelligencesquared.com/events/rembrandt-vs-vermeer-titans-of-dutch-painting-simon-schama-tracy-chevalier/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices