There is a conflict to me when i read robert solman's take on emotions, where were he really sort of embraced this view that everything is a fundamental choice. That always struck me as like, well, that doesn't seem quite right. Like that doesn't capture the experience like t sartra is talking about exactly. So i think the fact that he is capturing something real, at least some of the time.
David and Tamler don black turtlenecks and light up a couple of Gauloises to talk about Jean Paul Sartre's classic essay “Existentialism is a Humanism.” Why are choices so fundamental to our experience? What does Sartre mean when he says that “existence precedes essence”? Why does he try to shoehorn universalizability into a view that’s clearly hostile to it?
Plus, how much free time is good for you? Is that even the right question?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: