A lot of referees from mainly I guess the identification mafia, we're just completely ignoring the big question. Good research is research that significantly changed your prior's about an important topic. And you would have a paper that doesn't do a very careful identification, but still the combination of data and logical arguments makes a significant change of once prior beliefs in political science. The other was really the hostility now we didn't see many of them in the seminars, because if you're hostile you typically hide it in a seminar to a large extent,. But an anonymous referee could go full. So, I think most of the really hostile referees were actually not economists.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode