And i guess that kind of even thog you said, don't try te sit home, obviously for good reasons. I guess it kind of high lights am a point of her yo makin, given talks and other interviews about how it's so important to find your own trading method and not necessarily try and mimic exactly what someone else is doing. Absolutely.

That's actually what i give talks myself. If there's any point i emphasize, probably more than anything else, is what you just, you know, that don't look for the trading secret. There is no trading secret. Look for the trading method that's right for you. And it's nock t be the same for everybody. I sel word, that's absolutely true. And en bal demu's approach would be wrong for almost everybody, almost everybody. It's right for him ause his nature is, he just is not happy unless he's going against the crowd. He just always wants to be against the crowd. And if he tried trading another way, he probably wouldn't succeed, because it's so against his nature. It's not a good way. He actually could. And let any hinterview people, or people read that ping into you, they'll see, i'm gring to say, you knon, dont bother by the reason he makes money our trading against the markets that way is not because he he knes that h is great at picking tops and bottoms. It's because he's constantly trading against his position. So he's going short. The market comes back, nno. But he's buying a back. When he's buying, he would do like three, 500 trades a day. And he could be short like 500 stocks. But some ofe, whenever they he's shortty, if they dip a bit, he'll take partial or total profits and put em back on. So he's constantly taking profits out of market that way. So that's what's really making his money. And he succeeds even though he's against going to major trent's. It seemed clear to me that if he did the exact same thing, traiting ains suppositions, but went with the trend instead of against the trend, he would be a lot, he would be a lot better off. But explosively menture, he never really argued it, or could give reason why that wouldn't be true, but it was just against his nature. He just had to be oppositeto the wave in the market. If there was, if there was a maning of any sort, he had to be against it.

Sure.