AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Why Philosophers Love Things Like Brain and Vats and Zombe Arguments
If you subscribe to the notion that we are a inference machines, we are built to actively self evidence. And if we have a gerative model of our experienced world, and we can talk about and puzzle about qualative experience, we must also have a hypothesis tat first of all, we are things. Second, we are having a quartof experience with the alternate that we are not. It provides a really simple explanation as to why philosophers love things like brain and vats and zombe arguments. You're irrespective of whether they are useful. I think that teveryou shall ask everything you've just asked and see what he says. Bod as to tholine inok, bri