AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
22min chapter
Berghuis v. Thompkins
5-4
Analyzing the Ambiguity of Remaining Silent
The chapter delves into the complexities and ambiguities surrounding a suspect's right to remain silent during police interrogations, using the Supreme Court case Berghuis v. Thompkins as an example. The hosts criticize the court's opinion that staying silent for hours does not invoke the right to remain silent unless explicitly stated, highlighting the challenges regular people face in exercising their rights effectively.
00:00
Transcript
Episode notes
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode