In my world orders, you have these in or great houses. They seem to be competing, like the mogals, the sapavid, the outomans,. Even the hapspurgeso but to the extent that they agree, like the end of the world. There's a tacit, but very powerful agreement on premises which are naturalized and normalized. And i think internationalisns has overlooked that how you don't have to, agreement doesn't always have to be explicit.
Ayşe Zarakol on her book Before the West: The Rise and Fall of Eastern World Orders. How centuries of Asian empires from Genghis Khan to Timur and the early Ming Dynasty through the Ottomans and Mughals built dominant world orders and, ultimately, shaped the rise of Europe—and how that all might shape how we think about the crisis in the world order today.
Support The Dig at Patreon.com/TheDig
Check out phenomenalworld.org