If every mathematically possible structure is instantiated in some possible world, that would allow you to circumvent the argument i'm making now about the need for inputs of information. It completely destroys the possibility of reliable prediction or explanation. You get wolsman brain problems. And so these infinite unive cosmologies are necessary to circumvent cosmological arguments but they come at the cost of thea complete destruction in any reasonable confidence in the reliability of the mind. In other words, you can get rid of the god argument, but only at the cost of science. That's what i just described was chapter 18 in my book. What you just asked about is chapter 19. Perfect pa. Takes

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode