We challenge the notion that high injury rates are punished by market forces, as we dig into this article that posits the opposite: that safety should be a performance driver. Our analysis dives deep into the credibility and methodologies of the article, emphasizing the critical role of peer review and the broader body of knowledge.
We'll also scrutinize the use of data as rhetoric versus evidence, focusing on the transparency and rigor of research methods when interviewing executives about safety practices. Is safety merely seen as a compliance issue or a strategic investment? We dissect the methodologies, including participant selection and question framing, to uncover potential biases. Finally, we critique a proposed five-step process aimed at transforming safety into a competitive advantage. From aligning on the meaning of safety to incentivizing employees, we expose significant gaps in academic rigor and alignment with established safety literature.
This conversation serves as a powerful critique of superficial analyses by those outside the safety science domain, offering listeners critical insights into the complexity of safety management and its potential alignment with organizational goals.
Discussion Points:
- Re-examining the role of safety as a value driver for business
- Comparing contrasting research findings and cautioning about evaluating research
- Data as rhetoric in safety
- Transparency and methodology are crucial in research, especially when interviewing executives about workplace safety
- Executives' perspectives on safety are questioned, research methods are critiqued
- Clarifying claims and performance in business
- The five-step process for competitive advantage
- A study on the effectiveness of safety training methods
- Safety management is complex and requires evidence-based strategies, not superficial analysis or reliance on compliance training
- Strategic value of workplace safety
- Safety's impact on business success is uncertain, but exploring its alignment with organizational goals is important
- Takeaways
- The answer to our episode’s question: “the short answer is we still don't know!”
- Like and follow, send us your comments and suggestions!
Quotes:
“The trouble is, then we don't know whether what they're referring to is published research that might be somewhere else that we can look for for the details, or work that they did specifically for this article, or other work that they've done that was just never published.” - Drew
“We've got to be really careful…this is using data as rhetoric, not using data as data.” - Drew
“I wouldn't be surprised that most people see safety as both a cost and as an outcome.”- Drew
“So you've got two-thirds of these companies that don't even have any safety metric, like not even an injury metric or anything that they monitor.” - David
“So we kind of assume business performance means financial performance, but that in itself is never clarified.” - David
Resources:
The Article: Safety Should Be a Performance Driver
Episode 121: Is Safety Good for Business?
The Safety of Work Podcast
The Safety of Work on LinkedIn
Feedback@safetyofwork
