He gives a bunch of diagrams that show checkmates that could never happen based on the rules right and the first three are kind of obvious. There's one where this is the one that is going to haunt us just all all the queens and just this poor king in the top right corner i guess h h eight and everything else is a queen except for the white king at a one. Maybe he's making a comment on white supremacy and also like women are fucking taking over, she says. She adds: "I'm not saying they should retract the paper"
In this podcast we examine a recent argument for the view that chess is not, in fact, a game. We discuss the Grasshopper’s claim that all games must have a prelusory goal, as well as Skepticus’ objection to the giant Grasshopper concerning chess. We then turn to a broader analysis of the Suitsian account of games. Does the existence of illusory checkmates offer Grasshopper an avenue for replying to Skepticus? Should we bite the bullet and agree that chess is not a game? What is a lusory attitude? Is Tamler losing his mind? Why is David so giddy?
Plus – how should Arthur C. Clarke’s novel "2001: A Space Odyssey" affect our understanding of Kubrick’s movie? And a little more on Kanye.
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: