Do You Have a Warhol Argument?

The court in that case basically says parody is protected as fair use because of course the person being parodied isn't going to agree to the license. That becomes interesting in this case. Google v Oracle case it was 6-2, Gorsuch and sorry, Thomas and Alito dissenting Thomas wrote the dissent. I think that the court wants to find a limit like where copyrights are protected, first of all. But you also end up with this great argument about the parade of horribles. And since this is too live crew, do we want to say the next? It's all clean. This is the clean one. The second one is big hairy woman. You need to shave that