I get somewhat riled up by Twitter for sure. I think it's partly just not being clear enough about who I am. In my own case, one thing that helps is that I don't view anyone as like on the opposing team. And so because there's no opposing team, there's no like, oh, that's the bad guys. They're saying that's the thing. Yeah, I will try to be more like that. Well, this is a good segue. So when we were first prototyping the show, I suggested doing some experiments with different kinds of conversations, including one more jokey inflammatory kind of conversation. And you were not having it at all.
Read the full transcript here.
Is it possible to be both agreeable and skeptical in conversations? How can you give feedback and challenge people constructively without triggering their automatic self-defense mechanisms? More generally, how can you challenge people intellectually without riling them up emotionally? What skills are needed to be able to have detailed, productive conversations across a wide range of topics? How can you push through plateaus in the process of self-improvement? What are podcasts as a medium good for?
Find more about Spencer through his website, spencergreenberg.com.
Staff
Music
Affiliates