The government is trying to make Google be more competitive in order to reduce advertising costs. The argument that they're making, that google is using monopoly pricing and essentially has no competition, so can charge evey word - it's just like, oh god. You can just see these government bureaucrats feeling like they have to do something because google has such control on the market. So really, i'm not sure that there's men. Obviously, monopoly pricing is er a thing that happens. But the thing is, consumers use google because they want to. I mean, sent just a simple google search results in at least ten alternative web browsers that offer you more privacy, security features, different experiences.
How do you get to the point where you like a company a lot, and want to invest, but in doing your homework, you end up coming up with convincing reasons not to buy it?
This week on InvestED, Phil and Danielle circle back to their discussion on Google, specifically, its regulatory risks that may convince believers in the company to consider not investing.
Tune in to this week’s podcast to learn more about Google’s unique position, its risks, and other world happenings to keep in mind when it comes to investing in big companies.
To learn more about how to responsibly plan for a successful investing future, download Phil’s 12-Month Financial Success Planner: https://bit.ly/3AmNEud
Resources Discussed:
Topics Discussed:
- Investing during world conflict
- Regulatory Risk
- Regulatory intervention
- Confirmation bias
- Inversions
For show notes and more information visit www.investedpodcast.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices