The Consensus Is the Interpretation of the Evidence

i think the philosophy doesn't matter when it comes to the test and prediction. Testale predictions supersede everything else. If you say, i believe in a square circle, and you can make testable predictions in a ok, square circle. You need somewhane to differentiate imagination from reality. That's the philosophy part. Arne has testl predictions there from a reasonable glued arne world is how abogen arna world is the naturalistic nightmare. Sorry. They can make oas agree with thebom. That's fine. At makes sassible predictions, is the one that's winning.