Hegel's Argument for Ontology, Is It a Failure?

Hegel would think having principles means doing the opposite of his method, which is you came to some sort of conclusion and then you assert it and then you move on from there without having. So instead of principle, let's use the word axiom. Badu thinks I have to presuppose as an axiom that being is multiple. And then, and then I can say mathematics is ontology, right? Once I set once I have the max, the axiom thatbeing is, that, that being isMultiple, then it's just follows from that, that mathematics isOntology. But if you don't accept those things, by the way,  then you would