Is It Permissible to Think Critically About the Previous Thing?

i think i made the error you suggested, because nobody is going aa talking about a period in which it was still contentious. And so therefore, possibly i should have said a hypothesis here. But none the less, there's many people who would argue it's not only still contentious, but actually almost certainly false. Ah, my point would be, yes, this is true to an extent. However, there is a subsidiary principle that people should be a watching out for. The vindication of those who thought critically about it in real time is not permitted rigt we will not see the resurrection of the repute sons of people who were stigmatized during am the initial phase a.

Transcript

Play full episode

Transcript

Episode notes

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!

Get the app