How to Save the Middle Class

6min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The idea that we need to protect or save the middle class is very common. The term has been used as a proxy for their general political rhetoric. When people talk about shrinking or middle class, what they're really talking about is elevated levels of poverty and an increase in pecarity. So it's sort of like generational conflict, right? Which we talked about with adam connover which it's actually not that it's perse wrong,. It's that when you're talking about it, you're not talking about what you really want to, or ought to be talking about.

“Building a wall won't save America's crumbling middle class,” Elizabeth Warren tells us. “Sanders healthcare will raise taxes on the middle class,” a CNN headline reads. “There’ war on the middle class,” a Boston Globe editorial laments. The term “middle class” is used so much by pundits and politicians, it could easily be the Free Space in any political rhetoric Bingo card. After all, who’s opposed to strengthening, widening, and protecting the “middle class”? Like “democracy,” “freedom,” and “human rights”, “middle class” is an unimpeachable, unassailable label that evokes warm feelings and a sense of collective morality. But the term itself, always slippery and changing based on context, has evolved from a vague aspiration marked by safety, a nice home, and a white picket fence into something more sinister, racially-coded, and deliberately obscuring. The middle class isn’t about concrete, material positive rights of good housing and economic security––it’s a capitalist carrot hovering over our heads telling us such things are possible if we Only Work Harder. More than anything, it's a way for politicians to gesture towards populism without the messiness of mentioning––much less centering––the poor and poverty. This week we are joined by Jane McAlevey, a union organizer, scholar and Senior Policy Fellow at the University of California, Berkeley’s Labor Center.