I think that reflects a kind of protestant like you have to work for it to be valuable. This is basically like if you run out of Viagra you can't fuck anymore. Yeah but I mean it more like an authentic experience where it's there's an external way and an internal way. But why is it more authentic if it's external rather than in? It's like maybe somebody would say like sure you can get pleasure from cocaine but is it the same as the pleasure you get from a human relationshiplike one of them might reflect something deeper.Yeah and I actually think that's probably true. Since you know starting serious meditative practice I've only done hallucinogenics when
David and Tamler talk about William James’ chapter on mysticism from his book "Varieties of Religious Experience." What defines a mystical experience? Why do they defy expression and yet feel like a state of knowledge, a glimpse into the window of some undiscovered aspect of reality? Is Tamler right that David has a little mystic inside of him just waiting to burst forth from his breast?
Plus – another edition of VBW does conceptual analysis and we’re sticking with ‘c’ words – this time the definitive theory of ‘creepy.’
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: