AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
3min chapter
Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta
5-4
Federal Indian Law and Tribal Sovereignty
This is really a case about federal indian law and tribal sovereignty. The constitution explicitly bars states from doing either of those things on their own. In the 18 twenties, the state of georgia started passing laws to abolish the cherokee nation. These state laws were challenged and taken up by the supreme court in a case called worster v georgia. That was in 18 32. Chief justice marshall said that under the constitution, only the federal government had pow or to manage relations with tribes.
00:00
Transcript
Episode notes
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode