Is That How You Feel When You Read This?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

i think that this paper does suffer from some problems that we should be fixing, like its ay, its layrd. Foundations have been laid though, like a lot of their scales, they say, have been validated. So i think we've been bind yes, just not as much. But imam human. All i want to do is feel a little less like a machine. Or imagine putting a little er vooines in daws of myself when i am proud of myself for being rational and logical. Now, i'm just confused. Am i less omor tell me, just somebody tellme, od get the scale. Swe'll have to run an experiment with you as

Panpsychism didn't give us river spirits or mischievous sootballs, so this time we go straight to the source - a defense of animism, and in a top 10 analytic philosophy journal. Could a failed argument for the existence of God establish the existence of trees and mountains with “interiority” and “social characteristics”? Tamler wants to believe, but is the argument that'll push him over the edge?

Plus – speaking of top journals, a doozy of social psych article: Is forgiveness better than revenge at rehumanizing the self? Let's check the voodoo dolls to find out. Tamler is delighted by David’s reaction to this one.